I picked this up because it’s something that’s interested me, despite not wanting to be a fiction writer. It’s a compilation of essays or snippets of essays that argue for/against/both MFAs or NYC as a means of…what? Becoming a fiction writer? Learning to write? Entering that industry? Depends. It doesn’t necessarily even argue education vs experience, but a much more specific look at which of these paths may be right for you depending on what you want out of it or what you may need at the time. Continue reading
I’m pretty disappointed in whoever the first person was who thought to compare this to Gone Girl. I get the reasoning, it’s about a man & a woman & the story shifts perspective about halfway through, turning the previous perspective’s version on it’s head a bit. But that’s where the similarities end. It’d be better to compare it to a greek mythological tale, or a Shakespearian play, or This Side of Paradise, or a Woody Allen film…not Gone Girl.
This is the tale of Lotto & Mathilde, two young lovers who get married quickly, & their lives before & after the marriage. They’re portrayed as yin & yang characters, opposites that fit perfectly. Told along with a bracketed, omniscient narrator’s insertions that function like a greek chorus.
It’s Pulitzer nominated, so I don’t have to tout its good reviews, but even the bad reviews I’ve read all agree the writing is good. Prose that’s lyrical, but clipped. The non-purple kind, that keeps you awake. Instead of dreamy visions, we get zoomed-in close ups with the vibrancy dialed up to ten. It makes it a real page turner & I feel that’s the main reason I didn’t put this book down once I started it.
So I’m going to go through some comments from bad reviews & argue why you shouldn’t listen to them.
- “WTF kind of name is Lotto?” The fucking awesome kind. Besides the prediction that this will be the new go-to choice of baby names for celebrities in 2027, it’s a name that describes exactly the kind of book you’re getting into even before you’ve read it, which is an extremely hard task for a writer. While implying Lancelot is chivalrous, romantic, & making you think of King Arthur, it’s shortened for a modern update as Lotto. Lotto is only called Lancelot after Mathilde dubs him so once he’s reached something of a turning point in their marriage & becomes a playwright. Lotto also reminds us of the lottery & the “fate” which is his side of the story, as opposed to Mathilde’s “fury.”
- “It’s all about sex.” There is a fair amount of sexual language, but I’d argue that when you’re reading a novel centering a relationship, one with frequent tips of power imbalances &that starts when both characters are in their early twenties, it’d be stupid to expect anything less. There was maybe one scene that stuck in my mind, only because it was degrading, & it’s purpose was to be degrading, so goal = achieved.
- “It was shallow & unrealistic.” These are fictional characters named Lotto & Mathilde. How many Lotto’s & Mathilde’s do you know? This book perfectly teeters between modern & mythical. But like any good myth, the dramatic emotions are heightened versions of familiar feelings. They are extreme versions of two ways of going about life (Lotto’s passive fate acceptance vs Mathilde’s aggressive fury). This book isn’t a surface level book. If anything, it lacks expanse. It tunnels in a pretty straight line, a perfectly orchestrated narrative tale. But if you’re looking for philosophical realism, I suggest another book I’m currently reading called The Course of Love by Alain de Botton.
- “I didn’t like the stereotypical gender role implications.” Which? There are several ways you could argue this, & I think a case can be made for many opposing sides. Has anybody written a paper on this yet? They should, there’s plenty of opportunities for some obvious Freud, Butler, & Plato footnotes.
I will say though that a lot of the language separates things (from the character’s perspectives) into “good” & “bad.” But when fate is involved, there isn’t much room for a grey area, or is there?
I debated for a while whether or not to include spoilers in this review, because a lot of the bad reviews had problems with the second half of the book, but I think if you go in expecting a certain kind of story, you won’t be disappointed. So this is the kind of story you’re going to get: It’s about a relationship, in which two people expect something from one another. Each has the perception that this other person will do something that will fix an emptiness in his or her own life. However, each of their attitudes about their own life impact the other to the point of either success or demise.
The rest is spoilery so please avoid if you have not read… Continue reading
Leigh Bardugo’s Six of Crows takes place in a fantasy setting that builds on Bardugo’s previous works, the Grisha trilogy. However, it focuses mainly on two places within the world: Ketterdam, similar to Victorian-English slums, and Fjerda, similar to a Dutch fjord town. (Rest may contain spoilers) Continue reading
Does an author influence its work? I tried to read this in the way I think a writer would’ve wanted it to be read. I tried to judge it based on its work and not constantly think about Marina, how close her age was to mine or how she had accomplished so much but still had so much more to go. But the works chosen were chosen because they were indicative of her. Continue reading
Nate Piven may or may not be a “bad” person. He’s certainly evocative of most men from a recent generation, a generation born in the beginning of a new hipster laden, politically correct world. But this in-depth perspective into his thoughts provides an outlook that doesn’t deem him as a “bad” or “good” guy, just maybe a guy unaware of his self and others. He starts out from page one as a bit of a dick. And years of rom-coms and story arcs have taught me that by the end of this novel, he’ll have realized his mistakes and learned a thing or two about women. Continue reading
I consider myself a frequent movie watcher. I’ve seen more than some people my age, but I’m certainly not a movie buff with the authority to quote French noir or every American classic. & there are times when I’m not sure if the main character Joe is qualified either. He actually doesn’t even get Tyler Durden’s name right at one point. Whether this was an editing typo, or intentional (it wasn’t) I’m not sure.
Joe (claims he’s) is a movie buff. He stalks people out of theaters & reprimands them if they talk during the film. After he has sex with a girl, he watches films off her laptop for hours in her bathroom. & most importantly, he plays “the movie game” with his friends every week at a local joint. It’s a slight rift from the game where you name an actor or actress & must name another actor/actress with the first letter of the last letter of the previously mentioned name. In this version, you must name a film, the next says a person who plays a role in that film, then the name of a film that person has starred in, & so on & so on.
Joe’s got a lot of problems, a few he’s not even aware of. He’s got an absentee father, a mother who ran off, a sister who won’t leave him to pursue her Parisian dreams because she’s so worried about him, a side-chick who has a boyfriend, & a dream girl who toys with him by forcing him to read an incredibly intellectual & long book before they can sleep together. Continue reading
First off, I’d like to point out this is dedicated to Chris Martin, who, if it’s the same Chris Martin I’m thinking of, is a hysterical choice since he’s the lead singer of Coldplay. If it turns out that Mary Austin Speaker’s husband is actually just coincidentally named Chris Martin, I apologize…but it’s still funny.
This is a collection of ridiculously short poems, not all of them particularly well written, but there are a few which stuck with me & I felt the need to Instagram. Continue reading
Your Heart Is a Muscle the Size of a Fist takes place over one life altering afternoon in Seattle during the World Trade Organization protests. Shifting perspective from protesters, to police officers, to even a Sri Lankan financial minister, the story’s characters intertwine in unexpected & meaningful ways. Picture Vantage Point, but without Dennis Quaid, & if it were actually ridiculously good. Continue reading
Emma is probably most writer’s dream editor. She cares about her author as much as she cares about her author’s books, but does she understand her author as much as she understands her books? That understanding may be reserved for the author’s family. When the celebrated Brazilian author Beatriz Yagoda goes missing, Emma, Beatriz’s daughter & son, & even Emma’s poor boyfriend, are the most effected. There’s also some seedy publishers, some loan shark gangsters, & a team of confused hotel employees who get pulled into Beatriz’s disappearing act in amusing & even emotional ways. Continue reading
Stiefvater, you sly minx. You’ve done it again. There’s just no way that I can’t love this.
I have a fear of spoiling absolutely anything, but I’ll just start with a disclaimer that I am an incredibly biased fangirl of this entire series. I want endless scenes of these characters doing nothing from day to day. I want to know where they are fifty years later, what they were like as babies, what their favorite movies/colors/songs are. (Nope. Wait. We already know. It’d be the Murder Squash Song.)
I love my copy of this book I received from Fountain Bookstore, located in Richmond, VA. Maggie signed each one with a cute skull king & it also came with a drawing from her & bookmark.
I’ve reviewed the other three in this series, so if you’re new to The Raven Cycle then click here.
If not then read on, but be warned of SPOILERS. Continue reading